Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah vs Silvia Ambrosio Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Ambrosio wins 38.21% of second serve points, slightly less than Rajaonah's 38.88%. A pivotal metric in match predictions, this suggests Rajaonah may have a slight edge.
• Return Game Analysis: Ambrosio captures 51.82% of opponents' second serve points, while Rajaonah claims 53.33%. Conversely, Ambrosio excels on first serve returns at 41.03%, compared to Rajaonah’s 33.88%. Which player's return serve strength will dominate?
• Performance Under Pressure: Ambrosio saves 43.66% of breakpoints, whereas Rajaonah saves 48.19%. How crucial will this be in tight situations?
• Overall Performance Overview: Ambrosio boasts a 64.38% match win rate in the past year, closely followed by Rajaonah’s 61.76%.
• Surface Preference: Ambrosio is strong on Hard courts, winning 70% of matches, while Rajaonah performs best on Clay with 66% wins. Ambrosio struggles on I.hard, whereas Rajaonah is less successful on Hard courts.
• Level of Play: Both players frequently compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with Rajaonah slightly ahead, winning 61.29% of those matches against Ambrosio's 60%.
• Opponent Quality: Ambrosio's average opponent rank is 398.84, while Rajaonah faces stronger opponents at an average rank of 323.13. Does this indicate Rajaonah’s higher adaptability to tougher competition?
• Deciding Set Success: In deciding sets over the last year, Ambrosio has a 60% win rate compared to Rajaonah’s 59%.
• Break Point Conversion: Ambrosio has a slight edge, converting 44.34% of break points, just ahead of Rajaonah at 43.55%, highlighting a potential advantage in critical moments.

Editorial Prediction (June 13, 2025, UTC):

As we assess the upcoming tennis match between Ambrosio and Rajaonah, it’s clear both players bring notable strengths to the court.

Ambrosio shows a slight advantage on hard surfaces and a strong capability in returning first serves, making him formidable in certain match aspects.

Rajaonah, however, demonstrates consistency under pressure, with slightly better performance in saving breakpoints and higher opponent quality experience, potentially indicating steadiness in challenging scenarios.

While both players seem evenly matched in break point conversion and deciding set outcomes, Rajaonah’s edge in recent second serve points and experience against higher-ranked opponents suggests he might have the upper hand in this matchup.

Considering these factors, Rajaonah is likely to emerge as the winner in this highly anticipated clash.